Threats, Fear and Aspiration as Mumbai Residents Face the Bulldozers

For months, intimidating messages recurred. Originally, allegedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a former defense officer, subsequently from the authorities. Finally, one resident claims he was called to law enforcement headquarters and told clearly: keep quiet or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is part of a group opposing a expensive redevelopment plan where Dharavi – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – is scheduled to be razed and transformed by a corporate giant.

"The culture of Dharavi is like nowhere else in the planet," says Shaikh. "But they want to destroy our social fabric and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The dank gullies of Dharavi present a dramatic difference to the high-rise structures and Bollywood penthouses that overshadow the settlement. Dwellings are built haphazardly and typically lacking adequate facilities, unregulated industries release harmful emissions and the atmosphere is saturated with the unpleasant stench of open sewers.

Among some individuals, the prospect of Dharavi transformed into a modern district of premium apartments, well-maintained green spaces, contemporary malls and residences with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream realized.

"We lack proper healthcare, roads or drainage and there are no spaces for children to play," explains A Selvin Nadar, fifty-six, who migrated from southern India in 1982. "The sole solution is to tear it all down and provide modern residences."

Resident Opposition

However, some, including the leather artisan, are opposing the redevelopment.

All recognize that this community, long neglected as an illegal encroachment, is desperately requiring financial support and improvement. However they fear that this plan – without community input – might turn premium city property into an elite enclave, displacing the disadvantaged, immigrant populations who have lived there since the nineteenth century.

These were these excluded, relocated individuals who established the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of community resilience and business activity, whose economic value is worth between a significant amount and $2m a year, making it a major unofficial markets.

Relocation Worries

Among approximately one million people living in the crowded 2.2 square kilometer neighborhood, less than 50% will be eligible for replacement housing in the project, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to finish. The remainder will be transferred to barren areas and coastal regions on the distant periphery of the metropolis, risking fragment a long-established community. Some will receive no homes at all.

Residents permitted to remain in Dharavi will be provided units in tower blocks, a major break from the organic, communal way of residing and operating that has maintained this area for so long.

Commercial activities from garment work to clay work and waste processing are projected to reduce in scale and be relocated to a designated "commercial zone" distant from homes.

Livelihood Crisis

For residents like the leather artisan, a craftsman and multi-generational inhabitant to reside in Dharavi, the redevelopment presents a fundamental risk. His informal, three-storey facility produces apparel – sharp blazers, suede trenches, decorated jackets – marketed in high-end shops in upscale neighborhoods and overseas.

Household members dwells in the rooms downstairs and his workers and tailors – laborers from north India – live in the same building, permitting him to afford their labour. Away from this community, housing costs are typically 10 times costlier for a single room.

Threats and Warning

At the administrative buildings in the vicinity, an illustrated mock-up of the Dharavi project depicts a very different vision for the future. Well-groomed residents mill about on cycles and electric vehicles, buying western-style bread and croissants and enlisting beverages on a patio near a coffee shop and dessert parlor. This depicts a stark contrast from the inexpensive idli sambar breakfast and low-cost tea that maintains local residents.

"This isn't progress for us," explains Shaikh. "It represents an enormous real estate deal that will render it impossible for residents to remain."

Furthermore, there's distrust of the business conglomerate. Headed by a powerful tycoon – among the country's wealthiest and a supporter of the government head – the business group has faced accusations of preferential treatment and ethical concerns, which it disputes.

Even as local authorities calls it a joint project, the corporation paid nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A lawsuit claiming that the redevelopment was unfairly awarded to the business group is being considered in the nation's highest judicial body.

Sustained Harassment

From when they initiated to vocally oppose the development, protesters and community members state they have been faced ongoing efforts of pressure and threats – including communications, direct threats and insinuations that opposing the initiative was comparable with opposing national interests – by figures they claim represent the business conglomerate.

Among those suspected of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c

Jonathan Lawrence
Jonathan Lawrence

Elara Vance is an industrial engineer and sustainability advocate with over a decade of experience in optimizing manufacturing processes.